[address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Tue May 9 21:51:52 CEST 2006
* Sascha Luck: > On Monday 08 May 2006 06:28, Florian Weimer wrote: >> In the latter case, a >> rather significant fee is needed to turn global inconvenience into a >> local one. > > An arbitrary fee, specifically designed to block someone's entry into > *any* market, is *illegal*, at least in any non-communist country that > I know. Have a look at frequency auctions and how they are used to lock out competition from small players. Many drastic measures are completely legal. > I also don't understand the whole decision circling back, endlessly, to > restrictive policies when nobody actually seems to want IPv6 (assuming > this is still what we're talking about) The majority of those who post on the RIPE mailing lists deeply fear that there is a real demand for IPv6, so much that their routers are overloaded. I don't know why.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]