[address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Tue May 9 17:22:06 CEST 2006
> each ISP announces, in average, about 8 blocks, which is the small > constant factor. Yes, but in an ipv6 world, i don't really see why the average would be much more than 2 or 3. Most AS's will announce just one. > > Geoff Huston's talk about this at RIPE was rather interesting. Yes, the > > routing table will grow. But that's only part of the problem; > > So, you have found the problem. We all know that the two problems are routing table size and churn. But the two are not particularly related. A large routing table does not necessarily mean extra churn. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]