[address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
ripe-lst at eirconnect.net
Tue May 9 11:59:53 CEST 2006
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 10:44, Nick Hilliard wrote: > As regards cost, PI space requires RIR administration, and that costs > money. Additionally, there needs to be a means for RIRs to > legitimately reclaim PI space. Charging a fee appears to be good way > of dealing with both problems. It doesn't need to be a huge amount > of money, but money needs to be involved. Don't get me wrong, I've already said I agree fully with the need for PI-holders to become RIR-members (with associated cost). It's a fee, set arbitrarily high specifically to deter PI as suggested in the post I was responding to, that I have a problem with. rgds, s. -- DDO Eirconnect
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]