[address-policy-wg] Comments on 2006-01 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on 2006-01 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on 2006-01 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Thu Jun 15 13:37:02 CEST 2006
> I think you're missing the opportunity to read 2006-01 as meaning > "PI6 space IS permanent UNTIL we discover and agree the better way, > at which point holders of PI6 space have 36 months to adopt the new > best practice". > > I don't see an "implicit fixed lifetime" here, but a committed lifetime > to some point beyond our current horizon. how is this unlike the current swamp, other than it being potentially a *lot* larger? randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on 2006-01 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on 2006-01 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]