[address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
McTim
dogwallah at gmail.com
Mon Jun 12 15:24:59 CEST 2006
On 6/12/06, Stefan Camilleri <stefan.camilleri at maltanet.net> wrote: <snip> > some sort of fantasy plan for 200 /48's (and who came up with this /48 assinment > chunk anyway???) These are IETF recommendations IIRC. <snip> > > Funny but in my ignorance I am unaware of IPv6 Forum cool aid or whatever ... > Where was routing scalability not addressed may I ask. IETF set the above recomendations for the reasons of aggregation (and hence routing scalability). -- Cheers, McTim $ whois -h whois.afrinic.net mctim
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]