[address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall Murphy
niallm at avernus.net
Fri Jun 9 15:42:05 CEST 2006
leo vegoda wrote: > Where an LIR has an existing deployed IPv4 infrastructure and is > looking to provide IPv6 addresses for all or some of that network this > option is not too unrealistic. There is normally a reasonable basis > for working out what network elements an LIR needs to address. The > problem with a requirement like this is that it makes it more > difficult to evaluate the needs to new entrants to the market. Yes. And, sadly, it's new entrants who in some senses we'd most like to encourage. Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]