[address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dennis Lundström
dennis at gippnet.com
Fri Dec 15 10:29:06 CET 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sounds reasonable. Although It's possible to adapt to the rules and regulations without attending the course. It's a damn good idea to be there. If not for the sake, of meeting representatives from other ISP:s, and sharing ideas. And offcourse getting answers for our everyday woes and worries directly from the RIPE-NCC. I strongly recommend everyone who has not yet attended to give it a good thought. Best regards. - --Dennis Lundström GippNET AB On Dec 14, 2006, at 17:44 , Andy Davidson wrote: > > On 13 Dec 2006, at 16:16, Leo Vegoda wrote: > >> Several people raised concerns that new LIRs may not have >> sufficient experience to make good decisions with a /21 AW. > > To appease those worriers, the policy could say that the AW growth > from 0 to /21 is only permitted if the LIR has at least one admin-c > who has been to RIPE LIR training ? > > Cheers > Andy > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFgmrmsqJZaeZjsn8RAiUoAKCNs5Bt+XXXfRQ0z5y8ehGC0AVzdQCglkNt kZXrSr3ipHvAcen5Ab8N8zo= =5KEv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]