[address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Fri Dec 15 00:09:12 CET 2006
Hi, On 14 Dec 2006, at 17:23, Sascha Lenz wrote: > Andy Davidson schrieb: >> On 13 Dec 2006, at 16:16, Leo Vegoda wrote: >>> Several people raised concerns that new LIRs may not have >>> sufficient experience to make good decisions with a /21 AW. >> To appease those worriers, the policy could say that the AW growth >> from 0 to /21 is only permitted if the LIR has at least one admin- >> c who has been to RIPE LIR training ? > hm, i don't really see why making the policy more complex is helping. > My point from my former post(s) keep standing... just pass the > proposal so we can focus on the other more important ones :-) Just an incentive to encourage people to at least learn how to assign 'properly'.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]