[address-policy-wg] Allocation vs assignment question
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Allocation vs assignment question
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Allocation vs assignment question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Makc The Great
makc.the.great at gmail.com
Mon Dec 4 16:29:33 CET 2006
So, overall consensus here is like this: On 12/4/06, Amar <amar at telia.net> wrote: > > Ergo: There has not to be any connection between > subnets for each assignment. It is done > based on the proven need and not on a > physical connection between the requesters > networks. > Could you please explain then what does "Sub-allocations are intended to aid the goal of routing aggregation" phrase means in english?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Allocation vs assignment question
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Allocation vs assignment question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]