[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Tue Aug 29 10:45:40 CEST 2006
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Filiz Yilmaz wrote: > This proposal suggests to have the minimum assignment size for PI > assignments to be a /24 when routing is a major issue for a > multihoming End User. > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-05.html > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 26 September 2006. Hello. This proposal is proposing the same things I was arguing in my email, so I second this. I have a question though, the proposal includes the notion of "major issue", perhaps this could be specified a bit more? Or is it clear how this would be interpreted by a hostmaster processing an application, that if the customer adds "I need to advertise this on the public internet" it will automatically be known that a at least a /24 is needed? -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]