[address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2006-04 New Policy Proposal (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2006-04 New Policy Proposal (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2006-04 New Policy Proposal (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Koepp, Karsten
Karsten.Koepp at lambdanet.net
Thu Aug 24 10:30:21 CEST 2006
Hi Michele, I also support the goal of the proposal although I believe it will be hard to enforce. > Several ISPs maintain abuse email addresses, but when you submit abuse > reports to the supplied address they send an auto-responder > forcing you to > resubmit the data via a web form. > Think the other way around. 99% of your abuse inbox is spam itself. And people just forward spam to abuse contacts to complain. How can you make sure serious mails are being detected within the junk. A web form is just a measure to make sure abuse complaints reach people and are being dealt with. It is not overdemanded to fill in a form if you ask someone to spend working time solving your problem. YMMV. regards Karsten > What is the RIPE policy on this? > > Surely ISPs should not be making it hard for users / admins > etc., to report > abuse to them > > Regards > > Michele > > > Michele > http://www.mneylon.com/blog/ > http://www.searchenginecookbook.com/ > http://www.irishblogs.info - top Irish blogs/bloggers >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2006-04 New Policy Proposal (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2006-04 New Policy Proposal (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]