[address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2006-04 New Policy Proposal (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2006-04 New Policy Proposal (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-04 New Policy Proposal (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Thu Aug 24 13:50:03 CEST 2006
Michele wrote: > "Every organisation controlling an IP address should provide at least one > working contact e-mail address where notifications of abuse emanating from > that IP address can be sent." > > Several ISPs maintain abuse email addresses, but when you submit abuse > reports to the supplied address they send an auto-responder forcing you to > resubmit the data via a web form. > > What is the RIPE policy on this? Do you really not tied of reading tons of spam (yes, super wise guys send spam right to abuse@! It is cool! ;) )? So sometime it is only way to be sure it is a human is sending that e-mail... I think we should see not on the form, but on the reaction for the abuse report. Also I think it is good idea to periodically check other contacts (fax, phone) provided in RIPE objects, as well as adding "pager:" contact information (ICQ,AIM,JABBER,etc). -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2006-04 New Policy Proposal (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-04 New Policy Proposal (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]