[address-policy-wg] [jeffc at surbl.org: Re: RIPE policy proposal on contact e-mail addresses]
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-04 New Policy Proposal (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri
md at Linux.IT
Wed Aug 23 15:17:50 CEST 2006
----- Forwarded message from Jeff Chan <jeffc at surbl.org> ----- From: Jeff Chan <jeffc at surbl.org> Reply-To: Jeff Chan <jeffc at surbl.org> Organization: SURBL To: Marco d'Itri <md at Linux.IT> Subject: Re: RIPE policy proposal on contact e-mail addresses Wednesday, August 23, 2006, 5:41:25 AM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Summary of Proposal: > This proposal suggests that working and up-to-date contact e-mail > addresses should be maintained at all times for address space that is > registered in the RIPE Database. > http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-04.html > If you want to argue for or against it please post to the address-policy > WG mailing list. Hello Marco, I don't have access to that list so could you relay my comments that current and accurate contact info should be required and that lack thereof should be possible grounds for de-allocation, depeering, disconnection, etc. Many of the most abusive spam gangs use completely fraudulent and broken contact info. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:jeffc at surbl.org http://www.surbl.org/ ----- End forwarded message ----- -- ciao, Marco
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-04 New Policy Proposal (Contact e-mail Address Requirements)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]