[address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Torunn Narvestad
tna at telenor.net
Sun Apr 30 20:44:35 CEST 2006
Hi, I strongly agree with what Thor-Henrik has written below. I do not at all support this policy proposal. - Torunn At 09:48 27.04.2006, Thor-Henrik Kvandahl wrote: >Hi all, > >here are my *personal* opinion on this proposal. > >I do not support this proposal, and my reasons for this are: > >* This proposal increases the rate of consumption of IPv4. >* It favourises the large ISPs. >* In the presentation on RIPE 52, Tuesday by Filiz Yilmaz, we where told > that this proposal was abandoned by ARIN and APNIC, and one > representative from LacNIC also stood up and expressed their conserns. > I have not heard anything from AfriNIC, but I cannot see why they would > want to implement this policy. I feel if will be arrogant of the RIPE > community to disregard the other RIRs conserns and implement this policy. > >And I also have to agree with Gert Doering who said in the address policy >WG that there has been very quiet around this proposal, and that the >reason for this can be that ETNO claims thay "unanimously support this >proposal". > >-- >Thor-Henrik Kvandahl >no.telenor Torunn Narvestad Telenor Nordic
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]