[address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Multi-regional allocation question - transversing RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dmitry Kiselev
dmitry at volia.net
Wed Apr 26 10:13:47 CEST 2006
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:57:14AM +0400, Max Tulyev wrote: > Dmitry Kiselev wrote: > > >Opposite example - we serve about 60000 internet customers and have no > >problem to renumber almost all of them becouse we use DHCP. So, not any > >ISP/Telco will pain about renumbering. > > Try to imagine you have 60000 _web_sites_ :) I just show an example. There are some situations where renumbering become total nigthmare, but in some cases - no. In ISP market it is depend on operator's bussiness model. -- Dmitry Kiselev
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Multi-regional allocation question - transversing RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]