[address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dmitry Kiselev
dmitry at volia.net
Wed Apr 26 09:40:06 CEST 2006
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:10:19PM +0200, Nils Ketelsen wrote: > > Pardon me for saying, but all of this is bollocks. Renumbering is as easy as > > you want it to be. Make a proper policy and then create the tools for it. It > > is that easy. I am sure we can discuss poorly designed solutions any (other) > > time. > > You seem to have a very easy Job, when you can make this proper policy for > your customers. I can not, those (about) 100 connecting to my network all > have different policies, different needs, different requirements. And we do > our best, to fullfill their needs and make it as easy for them as possible. > We call that "service". If you do not have to provide this, good for you. > But please do not tell me, that my need to have paying customers is bad > design. > > Nils, not in the ISP-Business Opposite example - we serve about 60000 internet customers and have no problem to renumber almost all of them becouse we use DHCP. So, not any ISP/Telco will pain about renumbering. -- Dmitry Kiselev
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]