[address-policy-wg] Multi-regional allocation question - transversing RIRs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Multi-regional allocation question - transversing RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
McTim
dogwallah at gmail.com
Wed Apr 26 06:27:24 CEST 2006
Hi Hank, On 4/25/06, Hank Nussbacher <hank at efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote: > I have a large multi-regional client, who's main base is in the USA. > They are about to get a /19 from ARIN since they are multi-homed and have > about 32 sites, but they also have about 5 sites in APNIC and the another > 5 in the RIPE region. Do they have to become members in each RIR to get > multi-homed allocations, or should one RIR handle it all? IIRC this happens frequently. One RIR can satisfy their global needs. > > Would the answer to that above question change if the IP blocks used in > APNIC and RIPE wouldn't be announced locally in those regions but would > rather be MPLSed back to the USA and from there all Internet access would > be allowed (thereby making the IP blocks pseudo-USA blocks)? No, same answer (obviously). > <snip> > > So any official guidance is appreciated. My answer above is just common sense, which may not be the same thing as "official guidance" ;-) -- Cheers, McTim $ whois -h whois.afrinic.net mctim
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Multi-regional allocation question - transversing RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Renumbering sites (Was: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]