[address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Apr 24 13:26:23 CEST 2006
Hi, On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 12:24:32PM +0100, Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote: > > > You do realize that in IPv6 there is enough address space > > > to supply such a "land rush" in an orderly manner so that > > > everyone gets their unique PI block? [..] > That is precisely why I am promoting the concept of > geo-topo addressing. This solves global routing table > problem by using roughly 5000 routes for city-based > aggregates to serve millions of PI address blocks. > And it can be done with no new protocols, no new > technology and no changes to the existing PA address > regime for ISPs which want to stick with pure classic > PA addresses. Only ISPs which want to offer services to > geo-topo address holders will need to make adjustments > to their internal practices. Understood. I just wanted to comment on that specific comment, which wasn't made in the context of geo-topo addressing, but more "generally". Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 92315 SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]