[address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Apr 24 12:38:55 CEST 2006
Hi, On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 01:16:30PM +0400, Max Tulyev wrote: > > I accept that PI for BGP multihoming purposes is - today - one of the more > > reasonable ways to achieve the goal (ISP independence and resilience), but > > I still hope that we won't ever see the "let's get PI once, and never have > > to renumber again!" land rush. > > Please, take a look at hosting providers. Changing thousands of domains and > sites (probably not under his control) is a Really Big Problem. Most (if not all) larger hosting providers I know are LIRs, so this question really doesn't apply. And for smaller hosting providers, this can be done - yes, it's painful, but the alternatives are also painful. When asking for "PI-for-everbody" keep in mind that everybody *else* has to pay the cost, and if the pain level gets too high, might just decide to drop "PI-for-everbody" routes.. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 92315 SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]