[address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] [GLOBAL-V6] Re: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it less destructive
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] [GLOBAL-V6] Re: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it less destructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it less destructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Fri Apr 21 19:49:30 CEST 2006
> As far as fees, if the org already has IPv4 space of some sort, the PIv6 > assignment will presumably be free through 31 Dec 07 like PAv6 > assignments and USD1250/yr after that. The idea of charging thousands > of dollars more to discourage PIv6 applications is not in line with > existing fee schedules and rather pointless since folks can apparently > claim to be LIRs without much difficulty and pay USD2250/yr for a /32. > Only if the ORG is an ARIN member. If they are not a member, there is no waiver. Membership is $500/year if you are not an ISP subscriber member (which involves paying significantly more for your allocation/assignment unless you are a v6-only ISP). Owen -- If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20060421/bc63d455/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] [GLOBAL-V6] Re: Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it less destructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it less destructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]