[address-policy-wg] Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Hannigan
hannigan at gmail.com
Fri Apr 14 21:39:36 CEST 2006
On 4/14/06, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com> wrote: > > On 14-apr-2006, at 16:57, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > > 60 voted in favor of moving forward with PI. 6 voted against. > > Wow, 10 to 1. Amazing. > > Even more amazing: 60 people who represent nobody but their own > paycheck get to blow up the internet. > > Where is ICANN when you need it? This little experiment in playground > democracy has to end before people get hurt. I am a member of the ICANN ASO AC and I was there, but I'm not sure you meant that, and, the ARIN forums are open to all. The vote was a display to our advisory council to what the constituents "want". The ARIN mailing lists get just as much consideration. Where are you? -M< _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf at ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20060414/e6dc08e1/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]