[address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Oct 5 15:25:36 CEST 2005
Hi, On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:58:58PM +0200, Jørgen Hovland wrote: > So I can internally allocate 10 IPv6 addresses from our RIPE allocated /64, > "IPv6 customer DSL pool", and give it to the private customer? I don't have > to assign the customer itself a direct allocation? You can't "assign" an "allocation". Allocations are RIR->LIR, assignments LIR->Customer. If you give IPv6 address space to customers, you're *doing* assignments, and your company signed that you're going to do that according to policy (which says "/128, /64, or /48 - no other choices permitted, unless a /48 is provable too small"). Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 81421 SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]