[address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Oct 5 10:47:15 CEST 2005
Hi, On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 10:43:33AM +0200, Jørgen Hovland wrote: > >>End Users are assigned an End Site assignment from their LIR or ISP. The > size of the assignment is a local decision for the LIR or ISP to make, using > a minimum value of a /64 (only one subnet is anticipated for the End Site). > > I have a general question: > If the allocation is less than /64, lets say 10 addresses, can I allocate > IPv6 addresses from our /64 pool instead of allocating a /64 in the RIPE DB > to the customer? Or do I have to allocate a /64 in the DB and then give the > customer the 10 addresses? > I guess I can assign a /64 to the customer in the DB anyway, but the > customer will never get the entire /64, only the 10 addresses. Why should anyone want to give a customer 10 IPv6 addresses, and *not* a full /64? This would be very much against the spirit of IPv6 - "have enough addresses, and no questions asked". Inside an ISP's /32, there are 4 billion /64s. More than enough for your customer base, how large it may be. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 81421 SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]