[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Fri Nov 18 17:26:36 CET 2005
Hi Michael, Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote: >>>If they don't move quickly, then someone else will build that >>>anycast infrastructure and both DENIC and AFNIC will be reduced >>>to being customers instead of network operators. >> >>why would that be? > > Organizations who build and operate network are > network operators. Organizations who buy network > services from network operators are customers. that's clear - I just wondered where the conclusion came from that if someone would build an anycast infrastructure TLD operators had no other chance than to just become customers of those. Best, Carsten
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]