[address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Fri Nov 18 17:13:17 CET 2005
>> RIPE NCC is known to be very reasonable towards transit networks, >> and I could bet good money you could get an allocation without a >> hitch. > So what you say is "keep the current rule as the NCC will disobey it > anyway". Why can't we just fix the broken policy.... how much should policy be twisted to cover up broken/incomplete technology? the need will be continual and infinite. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]