[address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Fri Nov 18 13:58:36 CET 2005
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:52:05AM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote: > If you are really too small, that is you have at most 10 sites, then you > simply are too small. Who are you to decide who is too small to be allowed independence? Who are you to decide that size is the determining factor for that? /me goes looking wether human rights are dependent on body size. [and before anyone starts argueing that technical and economical independence from their ISP(s) are not a human right: you know what an analogy is?] Regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]