[address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeroen Massar
jeroen at unfix.org
Fri Nov 18 10:52:05 CET 2005
Andre Oppermann wrote: > There is NO WAY for large corporate and government entities to put them > at the mercy of any single random ISP again. They've learned it the > hard way with IPv4 already and go exclusively with PI address space now. Have you ever taken a look at the list of companies that already have an IPv6 allocation??? FYI: Check http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/dfp/all/ There seem to be quite a large number of 'corporations' which don't typically fit the ISP bill according to many people. Again: Fill in the forms and go to RIPE/ARIN/LACNIC/AFRINIC/APNIC. If you are really too small, that is you have at most 10 sites, then you simply are too small. I still have not heared anybody getting rejected by RIPE, except for some home users wanting /32's over DSL and other silly stories. Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 238 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20051118/954a772b/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]