[address-policy-wg] Real multihoming or anycast?

Michael.Dillon at radianz.com (Michael.Dillon at radianz.com) wrote:

> This makes more sense than giving a /32 to everyone who
> feels that their service is "critical". If you analyse the
> situation by the 80/20 rule, then Google represents the
> 20% of "critical" services that are big enough to be their
> own ISP. My suggestion is meant to support the 80% of
> "critical" services that could benefit from the same 
> technology as Google, but which are not large enough to
> go it alone.

Yet, we do not have a solution (in the RIPE area) for your 20%.

Elmar.

--

"Begehe nur nicht den Fehler, Meinung durch Sachverstand zu substituieren."
                          (PLemken, <bu6o7e$e6v0p$2 at ID-31.news.uni-berlin.de>)

--------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---