[address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nils Ketelsen
nils at druecke.strg-alt-entf.org
Wed Mar 2 14:46:09 CET 2005
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 11:38:50AM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > On 2-mrt-05, at 11:29, Daniel Roesen wrote: > >Doing more-specific multihoming makes ONLY sense when planning to > >filter > >them at some point in time. Unfortunately at exactly this point, this > >scheme fails. This cannot be fixed in time and with education, this is > >a very fundamental problem of this approach. > No, it's not. Keeping the aggregate up isn't hard to do, and all the > other stuff is even easier. I want a second uplink to another provider for one simple reason: I do not trust one single provider to deliver the Level of service I want. Making a backup, that still relies on the first provider to work is only of limited use. I want a backup, that also works if Provider1 loses all his peers, burns down, goes bankrupt etc. Nils -- Will trade links for food. [geklaut bei www.userfriendly.org]
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]