[address-policy-wg] IPv6 addresses to transit-providers
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 addresses to transit-providers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 addresses to transit-providers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jon Lawrence
jon at lawrence.org.uk
Wed Mar 2 12:29:30 CET 2005
On Wednesday 02 March 2005 10:17, Hans Petter Holen wrote: > > Whait if I am (mainly) anIPv6 transit provider with 201 customers - all > beeing LIR on their own: > - I cannot get address space from my upstream because I have none or > several depending on my size and definition of "up" > - I cant make a plan to assigh 200 /48s since all my customers are LIRs > on their own > - I am hardly an end site ? > > how do I get adresses under the current policy ? > If I cannot, how do we modify the policy to alow me to get adresses ? IMHO, this is what is wrong with the current policy. It says you should 'PLAN' to assign 200 /48s it doesnot say you 'WILL' assign. In order to obey the letter of the policy you could say that you 'PLAN' to assign each of your customers a /48 - whether they use it is entirely upto them (as they've got their own allocation they would probably never use the /48 from you). This would get you an allocation and be obeying the letter of the policy. You're not strictly lying, but it is a completely pointless use of address space. Jon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 addresses to transit-providers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 addresses to transit-providers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]