[address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elmar K. Bins
elmi at 4ever.de
Mon Feb 28 10:11:27 CET 2005
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se (Kurt Erik Lindqvist) wrote: > > Contrast this with eleven/fifteen v4 sets on five unicast (provider PA) > > and one anycast v4 (PI) address. > > So what you are _really_ arguing (or should be) is that you can get PA > IPv4 but does not qualify for PA IPv6. That is something completely We're a LIR, so naturally (!) we have our v4 PA. Funny enough, a v6 PA seems out of the question. Were this an ordinary end-site, I'd have no problem with it; unfortunately, I have to overcome a few things which includes rolling out a heap of name servers. As Iljitsch said, DNS has built-in redundancy. Unfortunately, it's still limited. The biggest obstacle is the 510-byte answer packet that can only be circumvented by anycasting the stuff (which of course is impossible with a PA assignment). The next biggest obstacle, of course, is that some people simply refuse to listen. -- "Begehe nur nicht den Fehler, Meinung durch Sachverstand zu substituieren." (PLemken, <bu6o7e$e6v0p$2 at ID-31.news.uni-berlin.de>) --------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]