[address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Fri Feb 25 00:36:06 CET 2005
On 25-feb-05, at 0:02, Elmar K. Bins wrote: > The real problem is DNS deployment > in v6. v4 has 11 (14 by June) of our servers, spread world-wide; I'd > like to do the same with v6 servers, but I simply can't. > Every f***ing registry on the planet has the special assignment policy > (with very strict rules, mind you), except for the one they always > send me back to ("sorry, not our business, you're in the RIPE region"). Well, there are more than a hundred TLDs and if they all want 11 IPv6 prefixes that would inflate the v6 table by more than 150%. I think a reasonable proposal from a good portion of the TLD community would go a long way, though. >> Of course the underlying question returns to "how to do IPv6 >> multihoming >> for A Special End Site". Everyone thinks they're special. That's how you get large routing tables. (It's not _that_ long ago that the root servers got their addresses from the organizations that hosted them.) > Is everybody busy waiting for the IETF v6-multihoming group to come > to a conclusion? In that case you won't have to wait much longer as this is going to happen within a few weeks. However, the multi6 mechanisms (that still have to be developed) aren't very suitable for multihoming DNS service.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]