[address-policy-wg] Re: /48 or /56 to 'home' end-sites?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: /48 or /56 to 'home' end-sites?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: /48 or /56 to 'home' end-sites?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Chown
tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Wed Dec 14 13:22:49 CET 2005
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 08:02:41PM +0100, Roger Jorgensen wrote: > quite sure there was a discussion about this some months back and most > people could agree on that a /56, maybe even /52 was a better size than > /48. But maybe it was on ipv6-wg at ripe.net ? I guess you mean this: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-00.txt Tim
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: /48 or /56 to 'home' end-sites?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: /48 or /56 to 'home' end-sites?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]