[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
McTim
dogwallah at gmail.com
Wed Dec 7 12:13:15 CET 2005
On 12/7/05, Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com <Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com> wrote: > > In regard to IP addressing policy, it is sufficient for the > RIRs to start doing things more wisely. If the RIRs would open > up another 1/8th of the IPv6 address space for geotop allocations > then they would no longer be blocking this solution. IIUC, the RIRs don't have another 1/8 of the space to "open up". they don't even have the whole of the first 1/8. IANA holds the global pool. The NRO *could* be helpful in lobbying for this, if their communities asked it of them. -- Cheers, McTim $ whois -h whois.afrinic.net mctim
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]