[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
leo vegoda
leo at ripe.net
Wed Dec 7 09:16:26 CET 2005
Hi Oliver, You wrote: [...] > P.s. @RIPE NCC: Question: Is there a practical way to replace the > slow and cumbersome "consensus" principle of the RIPE by a democratic > majority vote of the RIPE NCC members to stop further damage to IPv6, > perhaps with a decision at the next RIPE NCC general meeting ? > > Of course some RIPE participants might then discuss adresss policies > for ever, but for the RIPE NCC members we would then probably have > practically acceptale policies for implementation in real > world networks. I suppose that changes to the Policy Development Process (PDP) have to go through the PDP. If you want to submit a proposal to that effect then you need to complete a proposal template and pass it to the relevant WG chair. You can find the template at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/template/ There are also links to the main documents on that page. Regards, -- leo vegoda RIPE NCC Registration Services Manager
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]