[address-policy-wg] Re: a consensus, about what?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: a consensus, about what?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: a consensus, about what?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Kessens
david.kessens at nokia.com
Tue Dec 6 21:51:31 CET 2005
Gert, On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 08:38:40PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > > As an example, I don't believe we can justify that a very large entity > > has (perceived) difficulties in obtaining ipv6 addresses while a tiny > > ISP that has plans for 200 customers but doesn't quite have that many > > customers yet and in total has less users than the large entity will > > get a /32 without any problem. > > > > Basically, we don't need additional policies, we need a modification > > of the current policy to make sure that users of address space of > > similar size will get and can get similar sized blocks of address space. > > Partly I agree, and to some extent I disagree - the *size* of the block > isn't what people seem to be worrying about. The sheer fact that someone > can get (or not) an "independent BGP routing table slot" - which is always > "one", no matter how big the network is - seems to be. > > Starting to hand out different sizes might lead people to connecting > "importance" to "network size", which would be a wrong signal. I didn't say that sizes have to be different. I said that an organization with X number of users should get a similar amount of address space as another organization that has X number of users whether it is an ISP or not. As it is however, we currently do give out different sizes as a /32 is the minimum. My personal opinion is that we should keep this minimum as is if we decide to only give out address space to organizations with a very large number of users. My opinion is different if it is decided that organizations with a fairly small numbers of users can get address space directly from the RIPE NCC. A /32 is already extremely generous and at some point it just gets completely ridiculous. David Kessens ---
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: a consensus, about what?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: a consensus, about what?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]