This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] a consensus, about what?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] a consensus, about what?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Dec 6 20:53:36 CET 2005
Hi, On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:08:47AM -0500, peter.sherbin at bell.ca wrote: > Get rid of the current hierarchy which requires ISP in order to > connect to the network. The Internet is an aggregation of interconnected > networks. We want to replicate what the Mother Nature has already > given us, i.e. a brain like structure where neurons (individual > networks) have multiple direct connections with each other. As brain > cells networks should have about the same size. Network prefix > determines the size. Ah, back to the source-route-bridged times of (ring-) explorer packets... Sounds like a nice idea, would even be much more resilient than the current structure. Any IETF proposals where we can read up on how this is gonna work? Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 81421 SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] a consensus, about what?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]