[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Tue Dec 6 16:18:02 CET 2005
* Elmar K. Bins: > fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer) wrote: > >> > That's the independently-networking end-user problem we have. PI would >> > solve that. Removal of the 200 customer rule would solve that. One-block- >> > per-LIR would solve that. >> >> Doesn't need DENIC two blocks, one for their production network, and >> one for anycast? Or would you be willing to subject yourself to an >> ISP for the production network? Why not for anycast service? > > How come, it's always you who knows what other people need? This was a real question, not a rhetorical one. I was genuinely wondering whether "one-block-per-LIR" would be enough. Not everything I wrote is intended to be provocative. 8-)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]