[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Regional Meeting, Qatar, 17 - 18 January 2006: Updates to Agenda
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Tue Dec 6 14:55:47 CET 2005
My apologies for replying to such an old message, but I couldn't let this one go. On 18-nov-2005, at 12:33, Sascha Lenz wrote: > In particular, noone came up with an equal solution to BGP Multihoming > with "PI"-space, which i hoped for back then. Well, you haven't been paying attention, because I've presented "provider-internal aggregation based on geography" at two different RIPE meetings a while ago. The only thing I got was perplexed stares. You really can't expect to keep doing the same thing we've been doing in IPv4 in IPv6 but now with different results (= more reasonable routing tables). Iljitsch -- I've written another book! http://www.runningipv6.net/
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Regional Meeting, Qatar, 17 - 18 January 2006: Updates to Agenda
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]