[address-policy-wg] Re: how 200 /48's fails the job
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: how 200 /48's fails the job
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: how 200 /48's fails the job
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
leo vegoda
leo at ripe.net
Thu Apr 7 17:23:17 CEST 2005
Hi Mike, On Apr 7, 2005, at 11:35 am, Mike Hughes wrote: [...] > Can the NCC help by supplying some general statistics on IPv6 > allocations > (such as number rejected, and for what reason)? > > I seem to recall that we only seem to hear about successful allocations > made in the NCC reports. The number of rejections would probably make > far > more interesting reading/viewing. We are working on producing some statistics along these lines. If you'd like, I can prepare a presentation for RIPE 50 in May. Kind regards, -- leo vegoda Registration Services Manager RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: how 200 /48's fails the job
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: how 200 /48's fails the job
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]