[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Wed Apr 6 19:53:27 CEST 2005
> The 200 /48s rule does fail the job, in the present > environment. We should abolish it for the arbitrary, plucked from > the air number, that it is. care to do some plucking? > add a commitment (by the Chairs? group as a whole? NCC?) to > table a review of the situation once the i*tf do come up with > something, and there is vendor support for it? <pedantry> american readers beware the brits have the opposite meaning of 'table'. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]