[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Apr 5 18:50:42 CEST 2005
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:00:11AM +0100, Michael.Dillon at radianz.com wrote: >> Now, a set of IPv6 policies in which no globally routable >> prefixes are longer than /32 allows router manufacturers >> to optimize memory usage and design router tables to only >> carry those 32 bits of the IPv6 address. > We don't have those policies. Supposed-to-be-globally-routable /48s do > already exist. heck, the fatal flaw with this clueles idiocy is that we don't want vendors hard coding anything like this. remember when a/b/c were hard coded in routers and in rip? of the stupid ideas we seem bent on repeating, this seems one of the worst. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]