[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: how 200 /48's fails the job
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thomas Narten
narten at us.ibm.com
Tue Apr 5 16:26:23 CEST 2005
> If these policies cause 2000::/3 to be exhausted then there are 7 more > tries left to do it all over again. No. If we find that 2000::/3 is not enough, we've botched things badly through poor choices made today. Using the remaining space a long ways from now (e.g, in 30? 50 years?) would perhaps be OK. Needing to use it anytime in the next 10-20 years means we've botched it. Thomas
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: how 200 /48's fails the job
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]