end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
- Previous message (by thread): end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
- Next message (by thread): end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Oliver Bartels
oliver at bartels.de
Tue Apr 5 16:11:30 CEST 2005
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:58:10 +0300 (EEST), Pekka Savola wrote: >I for one don't want to see the routers CPUs' screaming red when a >random brazilian ISP experiences a fiber cut and I see 5,000 v6 >prefixes churning in most routers in the world because of that. You won't see it screaming red. Because the job is done in about <50ms and this is standard business *today*. A 5000 prefix update is what happens quite often e.g. if an exchange router is restarted. What happens: *Nothing*. *No impact at all*. Question: Do you intend to implement IPv6 and BGP on a 8080 CPU ? >PI to end-users => lots of processing on routers when those sites, >their ISPs, transits, ..., experience failures. Pi works today. Pleas stop FUDing. Best regards Oliver Oliver Bartels F+E + Bartels System GmbH + 85435 Erding, Germany oliver at bartels.de + http://www.bartels.de + Tel. +49-8122-9729-0
- Previous message (by thread): end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
- Next message (by thread): end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]