[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Tue Apr 5 15:28:13 CEST 2005
On 5-apr-05, at 14:40, Gert Doering wrote: >> The IETF has worked long and hard on multihoming without PI. It would >> be superbly stupid to throw all of that away with the finish line in >> sight and forever increase the cost of routing just so lazy people can >> get away with hardcoding IPv6 addresses in their access lists. > I'm not sure how this ongoing discussion relates to *access lists*? They make renumbering hard. Many people want PI so they don't have to renumber. > We're talking about networks like: > - large-scale networks that have only BGP customers that already have > their own address space (so "no 200 /48 given to customers") How is this different from any other end-user? > - 3GPP networks that assign /64s (so it's no "/48s" given to > customers) I don't want no stinking /64. Give me a /48. > - smallish ISPs that could be a good driver for new IPv6 products > (because they are not old, rusty, and refusing anything new) but do > not yet have 200 customers, but maybe 30 very large ones... Show me some examples. I started an ISP with ~30 customers once and I don't think there are very many of those. They all tend to gravitate towards 0 customers or > 30 customers over time. > (In case you haven't noticed: there are a number of different policy > proposals being discussed in parallel. Please put your attacks > regarding > "access-list lazyness" into the correct discussion, wherever that > might be) Daniel was talking about PI here. Are you saying the above examples should use PI rather than PA? Doesn't make much sense to me.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]