[address-policy-wg] Summary TLD Anycast Allocation Policy

On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 02:49:24PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> >2. /32 vs. /48 V6 prefix - routability aspect
> 
> There are incorrect documents published which suggest that filtering at 
> /32 is ok. After changing these documents and waiting some time this 
> should no longer be an issue.

Agreed. We're still in early stages.

> >3. /32 vs. /48 V6 prefix - address conservation aspect
> 
> >There is no question that a /32 is quite a big block and that this
> >sacrifice
> >to "ensure" reachability from most network places is worth it.
> 
> There is at least a question here, even if we agree on the answer.
> 
> However, it's not simply whether it's worth it or not, it's a question 
> of doing the right thing. If we start changing allocation policies to 
> accommodate laziness on the part of router operators, where does it 
> end?

Agreed too.

Sorry for such "agreed!" mails without more content, but when trying to
find consensus, also expressed agreement is necessary. :-)


Regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0