[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Apr 5 14:34:46 CEST 2005
Hi, On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 02:31:32PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > >If they are willing to undergo the necessary paperwork, and pay the > >yearly fees, yes. > > Either having very many people get /32s is harmful, or it isn't. How > does paying the RIPE fee move this from "harmful" to "non-harmful"? It reduces the possible amount of applicants from "anybody out there" (many billions) to "anybody who thinks this is so important to his heart / business that he's willing to shell out serious money for it". This makes quite a difference, especially as it's not "one time up-front" money, but recurring fees. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71007 (66629) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]