[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Tue Apr 5 14:28:43 CEST 2005
On 4-apr-05, at 14:44, Gert Doering wrote: >> I guess that it may make sense to define a time frame here... i mean, >> an organization planning to provide IPv6 connectivity in 20 years >> would >> qualify here? > Yes. But how much harm can it do? This organization would eat up > about > 1/4294967296 of the address space, and pay a yearly fee to RIPE to > be permitted to keep it. Sounds like a fair deal to me. So where do I send the bill for the fee to take up space in my routing table? No deal. > If the address space is allocated and doesn't even end up in the > routing > tables, even better. That's what's site local ng is for.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]