[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Apr 5 10:18:12 CEST 2005
Hi, On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 07:46:32PM -1000, Randy Bush wrote: > >> gert, i am too busy to find the quote for you right now, but > >> the essence is that EVERY size limit that has EVER been done > >> in computing has proved to be to small in the long run. > > It has also been proven that EVERY memory size problem > > has been solved so far. > > by changing the addressing. and that is exactly where we got > into trouble last time. and our grandchildren will have the > same problem again. So what do *you* propose to do now? (On the math thing: you conveniently ignored my argument that we'll run into other limits *far* earlier than into the depletion of /32s - and unless *those* are solved, address depletion by handing out routable /32s really is a non-issue) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71007 (66629) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]