[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeroen Massar
jeroen at unfix.org
Mon Apr 4 14:59:11 CEST 2005
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 14:40 +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 06:57:42AM +0200, Hans Petter Holen wrote: > > 9. Summary of proposal: > > The proposal is to change the IPv6 Initial Allocation criteria > > outlined in the "IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy" > > (http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ipv6policy.html). The proposed > > change is to remove "have a plan for making at least 200 /48 > > assignments to other organisations within two years" and to > > I'm all for removing the 200-customer rule, as it's pointless... <SNIP> > So I'd go for a forward reference. Text proposal is below. /me goes with Gert, his version sounds completely sane IMHO. Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20050404/0b405ece/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]